Template / Design review

A design review template should clarify decisions before engineering takeover.

Good design reviews do not only collect comments. They make approval state, open questions, tradeoffs, and handoff readiness obvious so the next role can move confidently.

Review outcomes that are clearer than comment piles
Approval and open-question states that support handoff
A stronger bridge from design intent to implementation work

Product surface

Keep the workflow, docs, and ownership in one visible workspace.

Synaply ワークスペース

プロジェクト、課題、ワークフロー、ドキュメントがひとつの共有文脈に

JRZ@VQC]Ppg

現在の実行面

クロスロールのリリース調整

たった今同期
課題担当状態関連ドキュメント

リモートオンボーディング公開

仕事が動いても、文脈は離れません。

ENGレビュー中公開チェックリスト

ワークフロー引き継ぎ更新

仕事が動いても、文脈は離れません。

PM仕様整列済み意思決定メモ

実行に結びついたドキュメント

仕事が動いても、文脈は離れません。

OPS準備完了運用ガイド

ワークフロー

明確な引き継ぎ経路

1
プロダクトがマイルストーンと順序を定義する
2
デザインがレビュー済みの引き継ぎパケットを渡す
3
エンジニアリングが関連ドキュメント付きで出荷する

文脈

ドキュメントと更新は常に隣に残る

ドキュメント断片

公開チェックリスト、レビューノート、リリース判断はチャット履歴に埋もれず、仕事の横で見え続けます。

PM
DS
ENG
OPS
すべての役割で共有

These pages should lead into a real product surface, not an abstract SEO shell. Synaply keeps projects, issues, workflows, and docs close enough that handoffs stay legible.

What this page is meant to help with

A design review exists to reduce ambiguity before work advances.

That means the template should surface whether the design is approved, what still needs input, what tradeoffs were accepted, and what engineering should treat as fixed versus flexible.

What the review should answer

A design review exists to reduce ambiguity before work advances.

That means the template should surface whether the design is approved, what still needs input, what tradeoffs were accepted, and what engineering should treat as fixed versus flexible.

Record the decision outcome, not just the discussion.
Capture unresolved questions with owners and follow-up paths.
Clarify where fidelity matters and where implementation can adapt.

How to connect review to handoff

A strong review leaves behind a transfer-ready summary.

Instead of asking engineering to infer the latest answer from comments, the review should produce a concise handoff package with the key acceptance context already organized.

Link the review outcome to the issue or project it affects.
Summarize scope changes or priority shifts clearly.
Attach any decision log entries created during the review.

How Synaply should reinforce the pattern

The review template becomes more valuable when it stays connected to execution.

Synaply should let the review sit near the workflow state, linked docs, and takeover owner so the transition into engineering feels like a continuation, not a restart.

Preserve review notes near the workflow item itself.
Use the review summary again inside digest or release communication.
Keep the handoff visible until implementation is truly underway.

Use this when

Use this page when your team needs to:

standardize design review across product, design, and engineering
capture approval state before engineering starts work
package open questions and tradeoffs into a better handoff
reduce “what changed after review?” confusion

Move from scattered follow-up to visible execution

Use review output to strengthen the next handoff.

A design review becomes far more useful when its result directly prepares the next owner to act instead of leaving them to reconstruct the context.